IMG_1027.jpg

 Low Energy Home Alternatives

Low energy homes are traditionally associated with passive solar homes. Today, there are also other kinds of homes or house designs available: the passive house & the zero energy house. So a good question to ask yourself is:

What kind of house do you need or want? A passive solar house, or a passive house, or a zero emission house? Or a ‘customised house’?

 

Key Differences

Passive Solar Design

Passive solar design uses natural energy flows (sun and wind) to maintain the most comfortable indoor environment possible for a building for the climate in which it’s located.

Passive House

Passive House has defined performance parameters to adhere to, which include energy consumption limits to achieve the indoor comfort levels.

Zero Energy House

The Zero Energy House is essentially a Passive House fitted with a zero emission, renewable energy system to generate all the power that the house will consume throughout the year.


Passive Solar Design

The definition of a passive designed home implies that it uses natural energy flows (sun and wind) to maintain the most comfortable indoor environment possible for a building for the climate in which it’s located.

 


The terms ‘passive design’, ‘solar design’ and ‘passive solar design’ very much mean the same thing.

Traditionally these passive solar homes were designed to operate without mechanical cooling and often no heating either, depending on location.

The lived experience of these homes very much depends on the quality of design, the quality of construction, and the behaviour patterns of the occupants. If we assume that the designer and builder are skilled and diligent, then the major variable is the occupant.

Many passive solar homes work like a dream. However, they do rely on the occupants running the building well. We often say that ‘passive homes require active users’, as it can be a process and could take a little time for the occupants to work out exactly how to optimise the internal conditions to their needs.

On a cold day windows need to be closed, a task instinctive for almost everyone. On a hot day the windows also need to be closed, this is not instinctive to all and, depending on how the building is dealing with the increased outside temperature this (in)action may be counterintuitive. When the evening temperature drops those windows need to be opened to allow the building’s accumulated heat to escape, replaced with cooler external air. This requires someone to be home or awake, and willing to open the windows. In urban areas where people are not always home at the ‘right’ times and due to security concerns, this free natural cooling is not always happening.

The design considerations required to achieve a passive solar building include:

  • Orientation

  • Zoning

  • Thermal mass

  • Shading

  • Insulation

  • Ventilation

  • Glazing


Passive House (or PassivHaus)

Passive House is an approach that first addresses the building envelope (thermal envelope). Once this is designed and executed, indoor comfort (temperature and air quality) can be delivered in an energy efficient way. It defines the indoor comfort band as being 20-25°C with no more than 10% of the year exceeding 25°C. It also includes limits on humidity.  This is in contrast to the solar passive design approach, which does not have any fixed parameters. 

The Passive House has defined performance parameters to adhere to.  The parameters also include energy consumption limits to achieve the indoor comfort levels.

As you can see in the list to the right, many of the elements are the same and none of them contradictory to the solar passive designed house. 

Importantly, in a certified PassivHaus, the air-tightness is guaranteed because it’s tested before completion and certification, with 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals (air pressure) being the minimum compliance. The cooling requirements only apply if mechanical cooling is installed. Cooling must be used if the 10% discomfort criteria is not met.  In Australia’s warmer climate zones, most passive homes would be expected to incorporate cooling to compensate for the predominant warm weather. Contrary to common belief, the passive house approach can be incorporated throughout Australia irregardless of the climate zone.

Heating/cooling criteria are:

  • Heating demand max 15kWh/m2/yr
    OR Heating Load 10W/m2

  • Cooling demand max 15kWh/m2/yr
    OR Cooling Load 10W/m2

  • Air tightness of 0.6 air changes per hour
    at 50Pa (ACH50)

Additional points to note for the Passive House include the five key elements:

  • Orientation

  • Appropriate insulation

  • Airtightness

  • High performance windows

  • Balanced ventilation with heat recovery (heat recovery ventilation system -HRV)


The Key Differences Between Passive Solar Design & Passive House

The biggest single difference in a Passive House is the requirement for air tightness. Air tightness ensures that the heat flows into and out of the building are only via the heat-exchanger ventilation system i.e. controlled, so that indoor air quality is maintained with minimal energy input.

Air tightness enables the performance of the building to be accurately predicted; the Passive House software (PHPP) is the most accurate in the world (predicted vs actual performance) partially because the air tightness makes the building physics easier to model.

A Passive Solar home can be airtight, and many would be, but it has not been a key focus of the approach.

Once you build an airtight home the next concern should be for adequate fresh air for people and also for the building itself to prevent moisture build up and the formation of condensation. A Passive House requires a balanced mechanical ventilation system (equal volumes in and out) that distributes fresh, filtered air to all rooms of the home and heat recovery to ensure that the air delivered is fresh, at an appropriate temperature and requires no/minimal additional energy input.

Passive Solar buildings generally rely on natural ventilation for fresh air. This can work if windows are opened frequently enough and the wind, or pressure differences, adequate to bring enough fresh air in (it also requires the air outside to be fresh). Research shows most people do not open windows frequently enough for adequate fresh air (35m3/person/hour).

The quality of windows is significantly better in a Passive House. A typical Australian aluminium window has a U value of ~6, a Passive House window for an Australian project would have a U value of ~1-1.5 i.e. 4 to 6 times better thermal performance. The other key distinction is the air tightness of the windows themselves, many locally made windows are very leaky (for air). Check out the infiltration numbers on the WERS website.


Which is Best For You?

Well, it depends…

If you have a higher tolerance for temperature fluctuations and enjoy having your doors wide open for 9+ months of the year regardless of what is happening outside, then Passive Solar is probably still best for you.

We have designed many lovely Passive Solar homes for clients who still reside in these homes after many years.

If your tolerance for temperature fluctuations is limited, (bearing in mind tolerance decreases as we age, then maybe you need more control of your indoor environment. A Passive House will deliver that year round 20-25°C.

Having a mechanical ventilation system (HRV) in a Passive House does not mean you cannot (or should not) open your windows/doors. You can still open your doors and windows as often as you wish. However, the question becomes ‘do I need to?’. You won’t need the fresh air as it comes from the ventilation system.  However if it’s a great day and want to open up, it is not a problem!

The air tightness and the ventilation system of a Passive House therefore delivers the benefits of fresh filtered air at a prescribed rate to keep you healthy and comfortable, and an incredibly quiet home – a great asset for those adjacent to noisy sources such as a major roads or flight paths.

Why would I not build a Passive House?

  • I enjoy ‘feeling the seasons’ and being a bit too cool or hot doesn’t worry me

  • I (almost) never close my doors

  • Currently costs up to 8% more upfront

  • Requires more time and thought to design – higher design costs.

  • My builder doesn’t know how to do that (not the end of the world if he is open to learn the required construction process)

Why would I build a Passive House?

  • Year round thermal comfort

  • High indoor air quality

  • Increased resilience during heat waves (building takes much longer to heat up)

  • Improved acoustics

  • Ridiculously low energy consumption

  • Dust free, bug free interior (much better air quality during bush fires)

  • Blower door test guarantees I got what I paid for - i.e. construction quality


The Zero Energy House

The Zero Energy House is more or less a Passive House fitted with a zero emission, renewable energy system that is sized to generate all the power that the house will consume on a day to day basis through-out the year.  

It is an approach that is achievable in both cold and warm climates. 

Most ZEH also incorporate an energy management system (EMS) that assists to manage the distribution of the generated power during the day, and can also be designed to control shading (devices like blinds & awnings), ventilation (opening/closing key fenestration) and the HRV unit.  

In other words, it is no longer a thing of the future having a house that can self-control the living space temperature and the mood – and doing all of this at no external energy cost to the planet – irregardless of the external environment conditions.

A customised ‘solution’

You may decide for various reasons to customise your build design – ie to  pick and choose which elements to consider.  You may decide, for example, to select insulation and thermal mass but ignore ventilation and glazing quality. This is a risky strategy: any design solution that does not adequately consider the building physics, and mitigate risk where necessary, risks failure at some point. Such failures jeopardise the building fabric’s longevity, and pose a serious human health risk.

A project does not have to do all of things listed above for the solar passive house or the Passive House, but it does need to know (not assume) that the building can deliver health and comfort for its occupants at a reasonable energy cost and ensure the longevity of the building envelope.  Failure to do this could lead to eventual structural failure, compromised thermal performance, and sickness or disease to the habitants.

 

A word of caution…

Recent changes in the Australian building industry have seen increasing levels of insulation going into buildings (a good thing). However, most other building practices have not changed (a bad thing).

More insulation means a bigger temperature difference between inside and outside, which is a good thing most of the time. However, this can increase vapour drive, the push of moisture in the air from inside the building to try to get out (in the tropics this drive can be inwards). If the construction does not allow for this vapour to escape, or provide other means of moisture control, then interstitial condensation (i.e. in walls or roofs) can occur.

These issues have been documented in new construction work (even in buildings 3 months old) in Australia. And it has been and continues to be a huge issue in New Zealand, Canada and the USA.

It is fair to say that Australian building standards are many years behind most other developed countries. We are currently, at an industry scale, replicating the mistakes of other countries instead of learning and avoiding these.  The momentum of a ‘building practise’ can take years to die out.  Learning from our friends would help us leap frog the mistakes that they have made.  With applying a ‘build it tight, ventilate right’ approach would allow us to avoid the large rectification costs that will inevitably flow from ill-considered incremental Construction Code changes.

 

Key Takeaway Points

Both Passive Solar Design and Certified Passive House can deliver comfortable, affordable and enjoyable buildings in a range of climates, neither one is inherently better than the other.

Passive House allows a wider range of sites to deliver low energy and high comfort.  Just as important are its environmental benefits of ensuring that the household consume far less energy for the entire life of the building (which could be far longer than the original owners occupation).  Further benefits are also especially in denser, noisier and poorly orientated locations.

As with all issues of design there is no single answer, as we are all individuals and usually with varying site parameters. But you can develop a brief setting out your goals and aspirations, and then seek informed advice as to how to achieve them within your budget.  

If you are interested in designing a new house, be it a Passive House or a solar passive designed house, give us a call – with over 20 years of designing energy efficient housing - we have the experience and the expertise to assist  you.